Peter Gallagher

37 papers receiving 532 citations

Peers

Peter Gallagher
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Research and Theory 76
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 19
  • Family Practice 21
  • General Health Professions 229
  • Health Information Management 41
Replace Janet Mary Elizabeth Scammell with:
Janet Mary Elizabeth Scammell United Kingdom
Lorretta Krautscheid United States
Carol Anne Norton Australia
Beth Rodgers United States
Nelda S. Godfrey United States
Joanna R. Kaakinen United States
Danielle Noble Australia
Patti Rager Zuzelo United States
Lisa A. Seldomridge United States
Deborah F. Lindell United States
Peter Gallagher relative to Janet Mary Elizabeth Scammell United Kingdom Janet Mary Elizabeth Scammell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.1×
Janet Mary Elizabeth Scammell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Gallagher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Gallagher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Gallagher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Gallagher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Gallagher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Gallagher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Gallagher. The network helps show where Peter Gallagher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Gallagher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Gallagher Line = papers co-authored together Peter Gallagher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200466
2 201253
3 200737
4 201636
5 201331
6 200128
7 201026
8 200124
9 201223
10 201620
11 200720
12 201419
13 201816
14 201214
15 201713
16 201013
17 201112
18 201712
19 201511
20 201610

About Peter Gallagher

Peter Gallagher is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Research and Theory, Health Information Management, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 39 papers that have together received 575 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (17 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (10 papers), Nursing education and management (7 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (5 papers), Film in Education and Therapy (4 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (3 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (76 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (19 citations), Family Practice (21 citations), General Health Professions (229 citations) and Health Information Management (41 citations). Peter Gallagher has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Karen J. Ousey, Eileen M. McKinlay, Sue Pullon, Lesley Gray, Mark Huthwaite, Helen Moriarty, Bee Teng Lim, Patrick McHugh, Ben Darlow and Christine Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as The Clinical Teacher, Nurse Education Today, Journal of Interprofessional Care, Physiotherapy and Medical Teacher.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact