Peter Forrest
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy top 1%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 21
- Philosophy 13
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 5
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 3
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 3
- Co-authors
- D. M. Armstrong (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Australasian Journal of Philosophy (6 papers)Analysis (3 papers)Philosophical Studies (2 papers)Philosophical Papers (2 papers)Synthese (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Peter Forrest
30 papers receiving 329 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- History and Philosophy of Science 114
- Philosophy 259
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 237
- Theoretical Computer Science 22
- Cognitive Neuroscience 163
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Forrest
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Forrest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Forrest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Forrest more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Forrest
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Forrest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Forrest. The network helps show where Peter Forrest may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Peter Forrest, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 250 | |
| 2 | 1984 | 39 | |
| 3 | 1987 | 33 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 24 | |
| 6 | 1985 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1988 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 10 | |
| 10 | 1982 | 9 | |
| 11 | 1996 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1990 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 15 | The Dynamics of Belief: A Normative Logic | 1986 | 4 |
| 16 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 3 |
About Peter Forrest
Peter Forrest is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 35 papers that have together received 498 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (21 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Free Will and Agency (3 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (2 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Logic (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (114 citations), Philosophy (259 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (237 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (22 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (163 citations). Peter Forrest has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include D. M. Armstrong. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Analysis, Philosophical Studies, Philosophical Papers and Synthese.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.