Philosophical Papers

530 papers and 3.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 530 papers published in Philosophical Papers in the last decades have received a total of 3.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Philosophical Papers usually cover Philosophy (241 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (127 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (110 papers) specifically the topics of Philosophy and Theoretical Science (118 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (99 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (81 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Philosophical Papers are David K. Lewis, Lawrence Blum, Simon Keller, Donald L. M. Baxter, Terence Horgan, Mary Carman, Mark Timmons, Thaddeus Metz, J. David Velleman and Itay Shani.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Philosophical Papers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Philosophical Papers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Philosophical Papers.

Countries where authors publish in Philosophical Papers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Philosophical Papers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Philosophical Papers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philosophical Papers more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025