Peter Degn

506 citations
9 papers · 436 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization 5
    • Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction 3
    • Enzyme-mediated dye degradation 3
    • Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management 1

Peter Degn

9 papers receiving 422 citations

Peers

Peter Degn
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Biotechnology 67
  • Spectroscopy 102
  • Molecular Biology 310
  • Food Science 81
  • Catalysis 24
Replace Junqing Qian with:
Junqing Qian China
Sanjay Kamat United States
Thomas E. Gédris United States
Douglas B. Sarney United Kingdom
Michael Trani Canada
Amélie Ducret Canada
David Lesur France
Xiao Qing Mu China
Guzmán Torrelo Netherlands
Sinéad E. Milner Ireland
Peter Degn relative to Junqing Qian China Junqing Qian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Junqing Qian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Degn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Degn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Degn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Degn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Degn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Degn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Degn. The network helps show where Peter Degn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Peter Degn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Degn Line = papers co-authored together Peter Degn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2001121
2 1999105
3 200276
4 200867
5 199919
6 200915
7 200012
8 199212
9 20099

About Peter Degn

Peter Degn is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Cell Biology, Spectroscopy and Organic Chemistry, having authored 9 papers that have together received 436 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (5 papers), Enzyme-mediated dye degradation (3 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (3 papers), melanin and skin pigmentation (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (1 paper), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (1 paper) and Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (67 citations), Spectroscopy (102 citations), Molecular Biology (310 citations), Food Science (81 citations) and Catalysis (24 citations). Peter Degn has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang Zimmermann, Lars Haastrup Pedersen, Jens Ø. Duus, Jacob Holm Nielsen, Charlotte Steffensen, Mogens L. Andersen, Jeppe Emmersen, Ninfa Rangel Pedersen, Reinhard Wimmer and D. O’Beirne. Their work appears in journals such as Carbohydrate Research, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Journal of Food Biochemistry, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Journal of Biotechnology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact