Thomas E. Gédris

656 citations
36 papers · 580 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

    • Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies 16
    • Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 9
    • Plant chemical constituents analysis 4

Thomas E. Gédris

36 papers receiving 559 citations

Peers

Thomas E. Gédris
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Cancer Research 149
  • Inorganic Chemistry 47
  • Plant Science 123
  • Molecular Biology 172
  • Food Science 47
Replace Shashikumar Keshav Paknikar with:
Shashikumar Keshav Paknikar India
Roger W. Read Australia
Chimmani Ramesh India
Eng‐Chi Wang Taiwan
Ahmed El Hakmaoui Morocco
Norbert A. Braun Germany
Augusto Rivera Colombia
Kh. М. Shakhidoyatov Uzbekistan
Anil K. Saikia India
Simonetta Benetti Italy
Thomas E. Gédris relative to Shashikumar Keshav Paknikar India Shashikumar Keshav Paknikar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Shashikumar Keshav Paknikar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Gédris

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Gédris's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Gédris with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Gédris more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Gédris

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Gédris. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Gédris. The network helps show where Thomas E. Gédris may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. Gédris, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. Gédris Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. Gédris links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200356
2 200134
3 199632
4 200931
5 201030
6 199625
7 199924
8 199522
9 199720
10 200120
11 199819
12 199819
13 200217
14 199616
15 199716
16 199716
17 200316
18 199715
19 200215
20 199414

About Thomas E. Gédris

Thomas E. Gédris is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Inorganic Chemistry and Spectroscopy, having authored 36 papers that have together received 580 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (16 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (9 papers), Bioactive Natural Diterpenoids Research (7 papers), Plant chemical constituents analysis (4 papers), Bioactive natural compounds (4 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (3 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (2 papers) and Phytochemical Studies and Bioactivities (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (149 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (47 citations), Plant Science (123 citations), Molecular Biology (172 citations) and Food Science (47 citations). Thomas E. Gédris has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Argentina and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Werner Herz, César A.N. Catalán, Maurizio Bruno, Anake Kijjoa, Albert E. Stiegman, Carola S. de Heluani, Madalena M. M. Pinto, Alicia Bardón, P. N. Pathak and Gregory R. Choppin. Their work appears in journals such as Phytochemistry, Chemistry of Materials, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Biochemical Systematics and Ecology and Langmuir.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact