Peter C.K. Pook

16 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Peter C.K. Pook
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 815
  • Pharmacology 77
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 70
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 170
  • Molecular Biology 583
Replace C. Portet with:
C. Portet Switzerland
Timothy T. Soncrant United States
H.‐R. Olpe Switzerland
Guo-Zhang Jin China
Pamela E. Potter United States
Christoffer Bundgaard Denmark
Else Saederup United States
György Lévay Hungary
Kenneth N. Mewett Australia
Tine B. Stensbøl Denmark
Peter C.K. Pook relative to C. Portet Switzerland C. Portet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
C. Portet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter C.K. Pook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter C.K. Pook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter C.K. Pook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter C.K. Pook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter C.K. Pook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter C.K. Pook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter C.K. Pook. The network helps show where Peter C.K. Pook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter C.K. Pook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter C.K. Pook Line = papers co-authored together Peter C.K. Pook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1986297
2 1993209
3 1993140
4 198797
5 199492
6 201045
7 199445
8 201043
9 199340
10 201131
11 199030
12 201122
13 201618
14 20138
15 20202
16 20192

About Peter C.K. Pook

Peter C.K. Pook is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Complementary and alternative medicine and Spectroscopy, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (4 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper), Synthesis and Reactivity of Heterocycles (1 paper), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (1 paper) and Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (815 citations), Pharmacology (77 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (70 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (170 citations) and Molecular Biology (583 citations). Peter C.K. Pook has collaborated with scholars based in Malaysia, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Richard H. Evans, J.C. Watkins, David C. Sunter, David E. Jane, J. Davies, Philip L. Jones, Peter Roberts‎, Peter M. Udvarhelyi, Henry J. Olverman and Paul L. Herrling. Their work appears in journals such as Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, British Journal of Pharmacology, Advances in experimental medicine and biology and Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact