David Meredith

97 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

David Meredith
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 38
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 164
  • Anthropology 112
  • Pharmacology 178
  • Urban Studies 56
Replace Thomas Perreault with:
Thomas Perreault United States
Lars Carlsson Sweden
Ioannis Theodossiou United Kingdom
Jacques Chevalier France
George Curry Australia
Matthias Beck United Kingdom
Erik A. Nielsen United States
Peggy Petrzelka United States
Andrew Kirby United States
David Brown United States
David Meredith relative to Thomas Perreault United States Thomas Perreault's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×38×
Thomas Perreault · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Meredith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Meredith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Meredith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Meredith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Meredith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Meredith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Meredith. The network helps show where David Meredith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Meredith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Meredith Line = papers co-authored together David Meredith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 105 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011164
2 199476
3 201072
4 201169
5 201468
6 200753
7 200651
8 200845
9 201242
10 199134
11 202133
12 201129
13 201328
14 202127
15 199724
16 201622
17 201722
18 197522
19 201921
20 202221

About David Meredith

David Meredith is a scholar working on Plant Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Archeology, Sociology and Political Science and Anthropology, having authored 105 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agriculture and Farm Safety (21 papers), Rural development and sustainability (13 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (13 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (10 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (9 papers), African history and culture studies (7 papers), Australian History and Society (7 papers) and Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Laboratory Technology (38 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (164 citations), Anthropology (112 citations), Pharmacology (178 citations) and Urban Studies (56 citations). David Meredith has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John McNamara, Catherine Blake, Aoife Osborne, Caitríona Cunningham, Deborah Oxley, Michael Havinden, James Phelan, Bróna M. Fullen, Peter Cain and Noel Richardson. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, The Economic History Review, Sociologia Ruralis, The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension and American Journal of Industrial Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact