Péter Bauer

11.7k citations
203 papers · 8.3k · h-index 45

Impact in

Papers in

Péter Bauer

189 papers receiving 7.5k citations

Peers

Péter Bauer
Comparison fields: 5 of 214
  • Statistics and Probability 2.7k
  • Management Science and Operations Research 1.8k
  • Development 294
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 490
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 184
Replace Daniel J. Sargent with:
Daniel J. Sargent United States
Thomas R. Fleming United States
Niels Keiding Denmark
L. J. Wei United States
Paul R. Rosenbaum United States
Hein Putter Netherlands
Dylan S. Small United States
Mahesh Parmar United Kingdom
William M. Haenszel United States
Lawrence M. Friedman United States
Péter Bauer relative to Daniel J. Sargent United States Daniel J. Sargent's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×14.7×
Daniel J. Sargent · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Péter Bauer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Péter Bauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Péter Bauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Péter Bauer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Péter Bauer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Péter Bauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Péter Bauer. The network helps show where Péter Bauer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Péter Bauer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Péter Bauer Line = papers co-authored together Péter Bauer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 203 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994652
2 2006498
3 2009388
4 2009352
5 1999221
6 1969220
7 2000216
8 2010214
9 1991187
10 2005187
11 1997185
12 2005175
13 2002175
14 2008165
15 2015156
16 1981154
17 2015134
18 1998130
19 2007122
20 2007118

About Péter Bauer

Péter Bauer is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Economics and Econometrics and Physiology, having authored 203 papers that have together received 8.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (69 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (55 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (17 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (13 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (12 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (10 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (8 papers) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (2.7k citations), Management Science and Operations Research (1.8k citations), Development (294 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (490 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (184 citations). Péter Bauer has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Martin Posch, Werner Brannath, Meinhard Kieser, Franz Koenig, Rui Paulo Moreno, Franz König, Barbara Metnitz, Philipp Metnitz, Peter Hackl and Karin Schindler. Their work appears in journals such as Biometrical Journal, Statistics in Medicine, The Economic Journal, Biometrics and Intensive Care Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact