Michael Branson

2.6k citations
25 papers · 1.9k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Branson

25 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Michael Branson
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Statistics and Probability 1.5k
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 50
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 39
  • Oncology 66
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 79
Replace Nathan H. Enas with:
Nathan H. Enas United States
Frank Pétavy Netherlands
Bengt Hamrén Sweden
Atalanta Ghosh United States
Laurent Claret United States
Willi Maurer Switzerland
J. Kyle Wathen United States
Chris G. Harbron United Kingdom
Lutz O. Harnisch United States
Nadia Terranova Germany
Michael Branson relative to Nathan H. Enas United States Nathan H. Enas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.0×
Nathan H. Enas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Branson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Branson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Branson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Branson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Branson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Branson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Branson. The network helps show where Michael Branson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Branson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Branson Line = papers co-authored together Michael Branson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008322
2 2005293
3 2010282
4 2005184
5 2009149
6 2009148
7 2009125
8 200285
9 201182
10 201045
11 200643
12 200933
13 201231
14 201125
15 200920
16 200218
17 201117
18 201012
19 200410
20 20036

About Michael Branson

Michael Branson is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Pharmacology, Economics and Econometrics and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (23 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (1 paper), SAS software applications and methods (1 paper), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (1 paper), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (1 paper) and Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (1.5k citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (50 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (39 citations), Oncology (66 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (79 citations). Michael Branson has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Beat E. Neuenschwander, Frank Bretz, David J. Spiegelhalter, Thomas Gsponer, José C. Pinheiro, Gorana Capkun-Niggli, Martin Posch, Werner Brannath, John Whitehead and Péter Bauer. Their work appears in journals such as Statistics in Medicine, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, Clinical Trials, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research and Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact