Penny Moore

16 papers receiving 245 citations

Peers

Penny Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Library and Information Sciences 72
  • Research and Theory 16
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 8
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 82
  • Computer Science Applications 22
Replace Heidi Jacobs with:
Heidi Jacobs Canada
Anna Marie Johnson United States
Amanda Szapkiw United States
Alison St. George New Zealand
Matthew L. Wilson United States
Alan Bailin United States
Maria-Carme Torras Spain
Troy Jones United States
Amalia Monroe‐Gulick United States
Jane Stephens United States
Penny Moore relative to Heidi Jacobs Canada Heidi Jacobs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Heidi Jacobs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Penny Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Penny Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Penny Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Penny Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Penny Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Penny Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Penny Moore. The network helps show where Penny Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Penny Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Penny Moore Line = papers co-authored together Penny Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 199591
2
Media and information literacy: policy and strategy guidelines
201376
3 200744
4 201227
5 199923
6 201013
7 20016
8 20135
9 19875
10 20174
11 20133
12 19951
13 20211
14 20211
15 20131
16
Conflict and Tension in the Boardroom: How managing disagreement improved board dynamics
20171
17
Conflict and tension in the boardroom
20171
18 20210

About Penny Moore

Penny Moore is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Education, General Health Professions, Information Systems and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 18 papers that have together received 303 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (7 papers), Library Science and Administration (5 papers), Web and Library Services (2 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers), Education and Technology Integration (2 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (2 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers) and Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (72 citations), Research and Theory (16 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (8 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (82 citations) and Computer Science Applications (22 citations). Penny Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Fackson Banda, Maria-Carme Torras, Michael Dezuanni, Sanjay Asthana, Alton Grizzle, Carolyn Wilson, Diana Mitchell, Dave Collins, Susan Mace Weeks and Andrea L. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Professional Nursing, Journal of Curriculum Studies, JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration, British Journal of Sports Medicine and The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact