Jane Stephens

19 papers receiving 210 citations

Peers

Jane Stephens
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Library and Information Sciences 58
  • History and Philosophy of Science 21
  • Education 120
  • Safety Research 31
  • Information Systems 89
Replace Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe with:
Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe United States
Bárbara Fister United States
Sarah Park Dahlen United States
Karen Cachevki Williams United States
Eamon C. Tewell United States
Heidi LM Jacobs Canada
Qingmin Shi United States
Yasar Bodur United States
Marlene Asselin Canada
Pauline Hagel Australia
Jane Stephens relative to Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe United States Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.3×
Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Stephens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Stephens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Stephens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Stephens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Stephens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Stephens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Stephens. The network helps show where Jane Stephens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Jane Stephens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Stephens Line = papers co-authored together Jane Stephens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200565
2 200028
3 201125
4 201316
5 200816
6 200915
7 201315
8 201114
9
Social Skills Training: Teacher Practices and Perceptions.
200511
10 200811
11 200111
12 20099
13 20039
14 20114
15 19994
16 20184
17 20163
18 20212
19 20112
20 20111

About Jane Stephens

Jane Stephens is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Information Systems, History and Philosophy of Science, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Education, having authored 21 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (8 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (7 papers), Web and Library Services (5 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (3 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 papers), Publishing and Scholarly Communication (3 papers), Academic Writing and Publishing (2 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (58 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (21 citations), Education (120 citations), Safety Research (31 citations) and Information Systems (89 citations). Jane Stephens has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Greg Conderman, David E. Hubbard, Gang Wan, Margaret Foster, Robin R. Sewell, Michael N. Hazelkorn and Shanliang Zheng. Their work appears in journals such as Serials Review, College & Research Libraries, Science & Technology Libraries, Preventing School Failure Alternative Education for Children and Youth and portal Libraries and the Academy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact