Diana Mitchell

955 citations
44 papers · 612 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Diana Mitchell

38 papers receiving 566 citations

Peers

Diana Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Neurology 303
  • Sensory Systems 92
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 259
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 25
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 92
Replace Roberta Riccelli with:
Roberta Riccelli Italy
Matthias Ertl Germany
Jason A. Cromer United States
Peggy Wackenier Belgium
Kim Clark Australia
Jerillyn S. Kent United States
Nora Preuss Switzerland
Jouni Kekoni Finland
D. Papakōstopoulos United Kingdom
Marc A. Bouffard United States
Diana Mitchell relative to Roberta Riccelli Italy Roberta Riccelli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
Roberta Riccelli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Diana Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Mitchell. The network helps show where Diana Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diana Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Diana Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Diana Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201993
2 201350
3 202049
4 198342
5 200938
6 201335
7 200829
8 201627
9 201823
10 199923
11 201721
12 202020
13 202320
14 198519
15 201518
16 201915
17 201811
18 201010
19
Exploring and Teaching the English Language Arts
19999
20 20198

About Diana Mitchell

Diana Mitchell is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science and Language and Linguistics, having authored 44 papers that have together received 612 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vestibular and auditory disorders (11 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (4 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (3 papers), Comics and Graphic Narratives (3 papers) and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (303 citations), Sensory Systems (92 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (259 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (25 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (92 citations). Diana Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen E. Cullen, Patrick A. Forbes, Jean‐Sébastien Blouin, Charles C. Della Santina, Soroush G. Sadeghi, R. F. Hellon, S.N. Davies, Roberto Araya, Sabrina Tazerart and Soledad Miranda‐Rottmann. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Journal of Neuroscience, The Journal of Physiology, Pediatric Emergency Care and Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact