Paul John Cocker

25 papers receiving 808 citations

Peers

Paul John Cocker
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 418
  • General Decision Sciences 41
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 72
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 306
  • Biological Psychiatry 32
Replace Ian A. Mendez with:
Ian A. Mendez United States
Jay G. Hosking Canada
Brandon G. Oberlin United States
Milky Kohno United States
Leontien Diergaarde Netherlands
Lea M. Hulka Switzerland
Maria Mouratidis United States
Matthias Vonmoos Switzerland
Buyean Lee United States
Joost Wiskerke Netherlands
Paul John Cocker relative to Ian A. Mendez United States Ian A. Mendez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Ian A. Mendez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul John Cocker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul John Cocker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul John Cocker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul John Cocker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul John Cocker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul John Cocker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul John Cocker. The network helps show where Paul John Cocker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul John Cocker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul John Cocker Line = papers co-authored together Paul John Cocker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014101
2 201283
3 201179
4 201173
5 201264
6 201342
7 201439
8 201538
9 201433
10 201733
11 201730
12 201726
13 202121
14 201621
15 201620
16 202019
17 201718
18 201918
19 201617
20 201616

About Paul John Cocker

Paul John Cocker is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 827 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (12 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (5 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (4 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (418 citations), General Decision Sciences (41 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (72 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (306 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (32 citations). Paul John Cocker has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Catharine A. Winstanley, Jay G. Hosking, Robert David Rogers, Fiona D. Zeeb, James Russell Andrew Benoit, HaoSheng Sun, David Belin, Mélanie Tremblay, Bernard Le Foll and Sukhbir Pal Kaur. Their work appears in journals such as Psychopharmacology, Behavioural Brain Research, Neuropsychopharmacology, European Journal of Neuroscience and Addiction Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact