Paul Hildreth

20 papers receiving 690 citations

Peers

Paul Hildreth
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Communication 246
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 66
  • Computer Science Applications 70
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 90
  • Strategy and Management 164
Replace 和生 一條 with:
和生 一條
Line Dubé Canada
John Storck United States
Kazuo Ichijo Japan
Bente Elkjær Denmark
S. Newell United States
Glen D. Murphy Australia
Pak Yoong New Zealand
George Roth United States
Elisa Mattarelli Italy
Paul Hildreth relative to 和生 一條 和生 一條's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
和生 一條 · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Hildreth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Hildreth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Hildreth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Hildreth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Hildreth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Hildreth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Hildreth. The network helps show where Paul Hildreth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Paul Hildreth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Hildreth Line = papers co-authored together Paul Hildreth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000181
2 2003175
3
Communities of practice : creating learning environments for educators
2008106
4 201360
5 200560
6 201149
7 201444
8 200425
9 200423
10 200222
11 202316
12
Going Virtual
200315
13
Knowledge Management: Are We Missing Something?
200512
14
The Duality of Knowledge
200210
15 20249
16 20097
17
Computer Mediated Communications and Communities of Practice
20055
18
The Role of Contextual Clues in the Creation of Information Overload
20055
19 20192
20 20231

About Paul Hildreth

Paul Hildreth is a scholar working on Communication, Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Urban Studies and Strategy and Management, having authored 21 papers that have together received 827 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Knowledge Management and Sharing (7 papers), Regional Development and Policy (6 papers), Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (4 papers), Regional resilience and development (3 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (3 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (2 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (246 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (66 citations), Computer Science Applications (70 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (90 citations) and Strategy and Management (164 citations). Paul Hildreth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Chris Kimble, Peter Wright, David Bailey, Isabelle Bourdon and David J. Grimshaw. Their work appears in journals such as Local Economy The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, Contemporary Social Science, Journal of Knowledge Management, Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society and Journal of urban regeneration and renewal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact