Patrick O’Neill

1.5k citations
105 papers · 947 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Patrick O’Neill

82 papers receiving 734 citations

Peers

Patrick O’Neill
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • General Psychology 30
  • General Health Professions 217
  • Social Psychology 185
  • Literature and Literary Theory 94
  • General Decision Sciences 14
Replace Jerrold M. Post with:
Jerrold M. Post United States
Mark D. Peters United States
Frederick D. Miller United States
Hans Werner Bierhoff Germany
Randall A. Gordon United States
Benjamin Franklin United States
Nevitt Sanford United States
Daniel R. Stalder United States
Nathaniel Branden Switzerland
Danuta Ehrlich United States
Patrick O’Neill relative to Jerrold M. Post United States Jerrold M. Post's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
Jerrold M. Post · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Patrick O’Neill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick O’Neill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick O’Neill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick O’Neill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick O’Neill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick O’Neill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick O’Neill. The network helps show where Patrick O’Neill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Patrick O’Neill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Patrick O’Neill Line = papers co-authored together Patrick O’Neill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 105 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202176
2 198365
3 198955
4 202353
5 199750
6 195948
7 200341
8 200740
9 200527
10 200227
11 199623
12 202322
13 197519
14 202518
15 199916
16 199215
17 200414
18 202312
19 199612
20 200312

About Patrick O’Neill

Patrick O’Neill is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Museology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 105 papers that have together received 947 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Community Health and Development (8 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (5 papers), Franz Kafka Literary Studies (5 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (4 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (4 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (4 papers), Samuel Beckett and Modernism (3 papers) and Psychological Testing and Assessment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (30 citations), General Health Professions (217 citations), Social Psychology (185 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (94 citations) and General Decision Sciences (14 citations). Patrick O’Neill has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Hanley, Howard S. Hibbett, Srinivas Reddy Dubbaka, Jie Ca Wu, Hwee Ting Ang, Woodie C. Flowers, Anthony E. Kelly, Everett M. Rogers, Jing Qi and John R. Weisz. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, American Journal of Community Psychology, German Studies Review, Organic Process Research & Development and Modern Language Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact