Patrick Grim
Impact in
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Study and Philosophy of Religion
-
- Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
Papers in
- Philosophy 48
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 40
- Study and Philosophy of Religion 7
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 24
- Co-authors
- Daniel J. Singer (19 shared papers)William J. Berger (12 shared papers)Aaron Bramson (12 shared papers)Bennett Holman (8 shared papers)James E. Tomberlin (1 shared paper)Jiin Jung (7 shared papers)Stephen E. Braude (1 shared paper)Robert Rosenberger (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Analysis (11 papers)Noûs (6 papers)Synthese (6 papers)Philosophy of Science (4 papers)Episteme (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanBelgium
In The Last Decade
Patrick Grim
92 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Philosophy 417
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 152
- History and Philosophy of Science 136
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 184
- Artificial Intelligence 275
Countries citing papers authored by Patrick Grim
This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Grim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Grim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Grim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick Grim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Grim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Grim. The network helps show where Patrick Grim may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Patrick Grim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 105 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Language, Proof and Logic | 1999 | 128 |
| 2 | 2016 | 113 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 72 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 71 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 55 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 52 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 47 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 43 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 42 | |
| 10 | 1985 | 37 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 37 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 33 | |
| 13 | 1984 | 31 | |
| 14 | 1986 | 30 | |
| 15 | 1994 | 29 | |
| 16 | 2001 | 29 | |
| 17 | 1989 | 25 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 23 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 22 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 20 |
About Patrick Grim
Patrick Grim is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, History and Philosophy of Science and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 105 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (40 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (24 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (17 papers), Language and cultural evolution (10 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (10 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (10 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (8 papers) and Study and Philosophy of Religion (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (417 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (152 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (136 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (184 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (275 citations). Patrick Grim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Daniel J. Singer, William J. Berger, Aaron Bramson, Bennett Holman, James E. Tomberlin, Jiin Jung, Stephen E. Braude, Robert Rosenberger, Alvin Plantinga and Nicholas Rescher. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, Noûs, Synthese, Philosophy of Science and Episteme.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.