Patrick Grim

2.6k citations
110 papers · 1.5k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Patrick Grim

98 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Patrick Grim
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • History and Philosophy of Science 175
  • Philosophy 362
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 273
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 232
  • Sociology and Political Science 575
Replace Luc Bovens with:
Luc Bovens United Kingdom
Don Fallis United States
Kevin Zollman United States
Mark Alfano Australia
James H. Fetzer United States
Sibel Erduran United Kingdom
Robin Millar United Kingdom
Robert Kirk United Kingdom
Erik J Olsson Sweden
Anton E. Lawson United States
Patrick Grim relative to Luc Bovens United Kingdom Luc Bovens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Luc Bovens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Patrick Grim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Grim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Grim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Grim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick Grim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Grim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Grim. The network helps show where Patrick Grim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Patrick Grim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Patrick Grim Line = papers co-authored together Patrick Grim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 110 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006162
2
Language, Proof and Logic
1999130
3 2016108
4 199672
5 201667
6 199558
7 199556
8 201848
9 199844
10 201843
11 198538
12 201137
13 201333
14 200132
15 198431
16 199431
17 200424
18 198924
19 199322
20 199320

About Patrick Grim

Patrick Grim is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Philosophy, having authored 110 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (25 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (18 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (10 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (9 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (9 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (9 papers) and Game Theory and Applications (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (175 citations), Philosophy (362 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (273 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (232 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (575 citations). Patrick Grim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Daniel J. Singer, Aaron Bramson, William J. Berger, Bennett Holman, Steven Fisher, James E. Tomberlin, Jiin Jung, Stephen E. Braude, Robert Rosenberger and Alvin Plantinga. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, Synthese, Noûs, Philosophical Studies and Philosophy of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact