Daniel J. Singer

1.3k citations
39 papers · 559 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel J. Singer

38 papers receiving 519 citations

Peers

Daniel J. Singer
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Communication 78
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 125
  • History and Philosophy of Science 45
  • Philosophy 100
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 38
Replace Carlo Martini with:
Carlo Martini Finland
Adam King United States
Stephen John United Kingdom
Saul Benison United States
Nicolaus Copernicus
Glenda Cooper United Kingdom
Jens Christian Bjerring Denmark
Joseph Downing United Kingdom
Susan Anthony United States
Justin Reedy United States
Daniel J. Singer relative to Carlo Martini Finland Carlo Martini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Carlo Martini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Singer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Singer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Singer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Singer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Singer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Singer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Singer. The network helps show where Daniel J. Singer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Singer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Singer Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Singer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016102
2 201661
3 201345
4 201841
5 201838
6 201737
7 201328
8 201824
9 201919
10 201718
11 200316
12 201914
13 201513
14 198412
15 202110
16 20127
17 20186
18 20156
19 20206
20 20186

About Daniel J. Singer

Daniel J. Singer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations and Safety Research, having authored 39 papers that have together received 559 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (10 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (7 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (6 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 papers) and Game Theory and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (78 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (125 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (45 citations), Philosophy (100 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (38 citations). Daniel J. Singer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Patrick Grim, William J. Berger, Aaron Bramson, Bennett Holman, Steven Fisher, Jiin Jung, H. Bryant Nguyen, Howard Klausner, Demosthenes G. Papamatheakis and Anja Kathrin Jaehne. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, Synthese, Episteme, The American Journal of Emergency Medicine and Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact