Patricia Wright

72 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Patricia Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Human-Computer Interaction 346
  • Health Information Management 201
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 257
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 19
  • Information Systems 189
Replace Dag Svanæs with:
Dag Svanæs Norway
Omar Mubin Australia
Mable B. Kinzie United States
Richard Pak United States
Jacek Gwizdka A United States
Randolph G. Bias United States
Ron Artstein United States
Peter Gregor United Kingdom
Sharath Chandra Guntuku United States
Celine Latulipe United States
Patricia Wright relative to Dag Svanæs Norway Dag Svanæs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.3×
Dag Svanæs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Patricia Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Patricia Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patricia Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patricia Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Patricia Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patricia Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patricia Wright. The network helps show where Patricia Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Patricia Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Patricia Wright Line = papers co-authored together Patricia Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1973103
2 199897
3 200078
4 201071
5 197770
6 199865
7 199163
8 199860
9 198147
10 198043
11 197142
12 197039
13 199939
14 197136
15 196935
16 197834
17
An Empirical Comparison of Two Navigation Systems for Two Hypertexts.
198934
18 198333
19 198832
20 199829

About Patricia Wright

Patricia Wright is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Usability and User Interface Design (30 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (18 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (10 papers), Academic Writing and Publishing (9 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (5 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (5 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (5 papers) and Safety Warnings and Signage (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (346 citations), Health Information Management (201 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (257 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (19 citations) and Information Systems (189 citations). Patricia Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy C Wyatt, FRASER J. M. REID, Ann Lickorish, Daniel J. Kahneman, Seth M. Powsner, Else Nygren, Philip J. Barnard, Barbara Ann Wilson, Hazel C. Emslie and Jonathan J. Evans. Their work appears in journals such as Ergonomics, The Lancet, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Applied Ergonomics and Review of Research in Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact