Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

136.7k citations
4.5k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
    • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
    • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
    • Memory Processes and Influences
    • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
    • Multisensory perception and integration

Papers in

    • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 912
    • Visual perception and processing mechanisms 585
    • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism 562
    • Memory Processes and Influences 450
    • Memory and Neural Mechanisms 372

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

4.2k papers receiving 124.7k citations

Peers

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 85.5k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 39.1k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 36.7k
  • General Decision Sciences 4.9k
  • Social Psychology 22.3k
Replace Acta Psychologica with:
Acta Psychologica United States
British Journal of Psychology United Kingdom
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review United States
Behavior Research Methods United States
Brain and Cognition United States
Cognitive Science United States
Memory & Cognition United States
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience United States
Psychological Research Germany
Behavioral and Brain Sciences United States
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology relative to Acta Psychologica United States Acta Psychologica's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Acta Psychologica · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.

About Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

The 4.5k papers published in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 136.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (3.1k papers), General Decision Sciences (220 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.5k papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.4k papers) and Social Psychology (841 papers) specifically the topics of Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (912 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (650 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (585 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (562 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (450 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (436 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (372 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (361 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology are Michael I. Posner, Peter C. Wason, Keith Rayner, Alan Baddeley, Elizabeth K. Warrington, W. E. Hick, John L. Brown, Neville Moray, Anne Treisman and Patrick Rabbitt.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact