I.T. Chapman

3.4k citations
70 papers · 2.1k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

I.T. Chapman

69 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

I.T. Chapman
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 2.0k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.3k
  • Aerospace Engineering 453
  • Materials Chemistry 604
  • Biomedical Engineering 562
Replace S. Saarelma with:
S. Saarelma United Kingdom
M. Gryaznevich United Kingdom
N.C. Logan United States
M. Bécoulet France
E. Strumberger Germany
S. P. Gerhardt United States
T.H. Osborne United States
C. T. Holcomb United States
M. S. Chu United States
R. J. La Haye United States
I.T. Chapman relative to S. Saarelma United Kingdom S. Saarelma's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
S. Saarelma · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I.T. Chapman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I.T. Chapman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I.T. Chapman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I.T. Chapman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I.T. Chapman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I.T. Chapman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I.T. Chapman. The network helps show where I.T. Chapman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I.T. Chapman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I.T. Chapman Line = papers co-authored together I.T. Chapman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008186
2 2010120
3 2012101
4 201599
5 201092
6 201388
7 201271
8 201569
9 201462
10 200958
11 200955
12 200952
13 201246
14 201045
15 201044
16 200639
17 200638
18 201137
19 201236
20 201233

About I.T. Chapman

I.T. Chapman is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 70 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (67 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (42 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (25 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (21 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (18 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (14 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (6 papers) and Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (2.0k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.3k citations), Aerospace Engineering (453 citations), Materials Chemistry (604 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (562 citations). I.T. Chapman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Yueqiang Liu, T. C. Hender, J. P. Graves, M. S. Chu, S. D. Pinches, A. Kirk, E. Nardon, R. J. Hastie, S. E. Sharapov and S. Saarelma. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Fusion, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Physics of Plasmas, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact