G.L. Jackson

8.2k citations
149 papers · 4.1k · h-index 38

Impact in

Papers in

G.L. Jackson

143 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

G.L. Jackson
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 3.9k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.7k
  • Aerospace Engineering 1.2k
  • Materials Chemistry 1.7k
  • Biomedical Engineering 1.4k
Replace T. Takizuka with:
T. Takizuka Japan
T. S. Taylor United States
D. Gates United States
G. Saibene Germany
M. Murakami United States
M. R. Wade United States
W. Fundamenski United Kingdom
A. C. C. Sips Germany
O. Gruber Germany
A. Kirk United Kingdom
G.L. Jackson relative to T. Takizuka Japan T. Takizuka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
T. Takizuka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G.L. Jackson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G.L. Jackson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.L. Jackson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.L. Jackson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G.L. Jackson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.L. Jackson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.L. Jackson. The network helps show where G.L. Jackson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G.L. Jackson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G.L. Jackson Line = papers co-authored together G.L. Jackson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 149 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013198
2 1991176
3 2008132
4 2007122
5 2015117
6 2008107
7 2010105
8 200987
9 200685
10 200482
11 199281
12 198477
13 199374
14 200373
15 200772
16 201072
17 201172
18 200771
19 200370
20 200970

About G.L. Jackson

G.L. Jackson is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Aerospace Engineering and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 149 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (143 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (74 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (74 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (50 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (29 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (21 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (20 papers) and Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (3.9k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.7k citations), Aerospace Engineering (1.2k citations), Materials Chemistry (1.7k citations) and Biomedical Engineering (1.4k citations). G.L. Jackson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include E. J. Strait, H. Reimerdes, A. M. Garofalo, R.J. La Haye, M. J. Schaffer, M.J. Lanctot, T. S. Taylor, M. Okabayashi, M. S. Chu and W.M. Solomon. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Fusion, Journal of Nuclear Materials, Physics of Plasmas, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact