Otto Förster

2.0k citations
50 papers · 1.1k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Otto Förster

45 papers receiving 889 citations

Peers

Otto Förster
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Geometry and Topology 456
  • Algebra and Number Theory 147
  • Mathematical Physics 265
  • Applied Mathematics 268
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 30
Replace J. Martin Lindsay with:
J. Martin Lindsay United Kingdom
Kyoji Saito Japan
Takashi Itô Japan
Thórdur Jónsson Iceland
Mikhail D. Alexandrov United States
N. Lal United States
R. Foot Australia
Zdeněk Kopal United Kingdom
Itai Arad Israel
Jonathan Miller United States
Otto Förster relative to J. Martin Lindsay United Kingdom J. Martin Lindsay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×
J. Martin Lindsay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Otto Förster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Otto Förster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Otto Förster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Otto Förster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Otto Förster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Otto Förster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Otto Förster. The network helps show where Otto Förster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Otto Förster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Otto Förster Line = papers co-authored together Otto Förster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1981329
2 1987136
3 1983100
4 196455
5 197748
6 196747
7 198031
8 196629
9 198928
10 197026
11 196623
12 197422
13 197120
14 198219
15 196418
16 200614
17 198614
18 197211
19 19689
20 19679

About Otto Förster

Otto Förster is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Analytical Chemistry, Atmospheric Science and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (4 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (3 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (3 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (3 papers), Advanced Theoretical and Applied Studies in Material Sciences and Geometry (2 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (2 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (2 papers) and Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (456 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (147 citations), Mathematical Physics (265 citations), Applied Mathematics (268 citations) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (30 citations). Otto Förster has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Hojatollah Vali, N. Petersen, Dieter Richter, H. Kozur, Tibor Kántor, G. Morteani, Tilo von Dobeneck, L. Bachmann, Heinz W. Kozur and Robert Hall. Their work appears in journals such as Mathematische Zeitschrift, Inventiones mathematicae, Mathematische Annalen, Microchimica Acta and manuscripta mathematica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact