Оксана Бабенко

893 citations
65 papers · 567 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Оксана Бабенко

57 papers receiving 546 citations

Peers

Оксана Бабенко
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Family Practice 14
  • Clinical Psychology 129
  • General Health Professions 106
  • Applied Psychology 18
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 98
Replace Mario Cruz with:
Mario Cruz United States
Lynn E. Kunkel United States
Mary K. McCurry United States
Manuel Sánchez‐García Spain
Lorraine Noble United Kingdom
Michelle L. Litchman United States
Rebecca Erschens Germany
Richard Brightwell Australia
Teresa Loda Germany
Karina Pereira‐Lima United States
Оксана Бабенко relative to Mario Cruz United States Mario Cruz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Mario Cruz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Оксана Бабенко

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Оксана Бабенко's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Оксана Бабенко with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Оксана Бабенко more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Оксана Бабенко

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Оксана Бабенко. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Оксана Бабенко. The network helps show where Оксана Бабенко may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Оксана Бабенко, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Оксана Бабенко Line = papers co-authored together Оксана Бабенко links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201948
2 201740
3 201840
4 201933
5 201932
6 201732
7 201830
8 201728
9 202227
10 201818
11 201718
12 201817
13 201914
14 201612
15 201711
16 201711
17 202010
18 20239
19 20178
20 20187

About Оксана Бабенко

Оксана Бабенко is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Family Practice and Education, having authored 65 papers that have together received 567 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (15 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (11 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (6 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (5 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (3 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers) and Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (14 citations), Clinical Psychology (129 citations), General Health Professions (106 citations), Applied Psychology (18 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (98 citations). Оксана Бабенко has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Russia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Amber D. Mosewich, Anna Oswald, Ann Lee, Qi Guo, Shelley Ross, Hollis Lai, Jonathan White, Adam Neufeld, Greg Malin and Sandy Campbell. Their work appears in journals such as Teaching and Learning in Medicine, Medical Teacher, Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, PLoS ONE and Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact