Noah Lenstra

505 citations
62 papers · 333 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Noah Lenstra

51 papers receiving 293 citations

Peers

Noah Lenstra
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Library and Information Sciences 162
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 9
  • Communication 46
  • Demography 49
  • General Health Professions 83
Replace Ágústa Pálsdóttir with:
Ágústa Pálsdóttir Iceland
Tara La Rose Canada
Kathleen de la Peña McCook United States
Beth S. Woodard United States
Selinda Berg Canada
Christine Marton Canada
Penny Moore United States
Péter Macauley Australia
Susan K. Martin United States
Sharon L. Bostick United States
Noah Lenstra relative to Ágústa Pálsdóttir Iceland Ágústa Pálsdóttir's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Ágústa Pálsdóttir · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Noah Lenstra

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Noah Lenstra's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noah Lenstra with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noah Lenstra more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Noah Lenstra

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noah Lenstra. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noah Lenstra. The network helps show where Noah Lenstra may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Noah Lenstra, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Noah Lenstra Line = papers co-authored together Noah Lenstra links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201941
2 201725
3 201721
4 202120
5 201719
6 201919
7 201916
8 201813
9 201712
10 201712
11 201911
12 202210
13 20229
14 20237
15 20216
16 20136
17 20225
18 20175
19 20204
20 20204

About Noah Lenstra

Noah Lenstra is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, General Health Professions, Demography, Information Systems and Communication, having authored 62 papers that have together received 333 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Administration (31 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (13 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (7 papers), Web and Library Services (6 papers), Urban Agriculture and Sustainability (6 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (5 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (5 papers) and Library Science and Information Literacy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (162 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (9 citations), Communication (46 citations), Demography (49 citations) and General Health Professions (83 citations). Noah Lenstra has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Vårheim, Kate Williams, Shameem Ahmed, Karen S. Baker, Qiyuan Liu, Kenzie Latham-Mintus, Keshia M. Pollack Porter, Mary Grace Flaherty, Cynthia K. Perry and Rebecca A. Seguin‐Fowler. Their work appears in journals such as Public Library Quarterly, Health Promotion Practice, First Monday, Library trends and Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact