Health Promotion Practice

2.4k papers and 45.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.4k papers published in Health Promotion Practice in the last decades have received a total of 45.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Health Promotion Practice usually cover General Health Professions (1.4k papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (465 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (337 papers) specifically the topics of Health Policy Implementation Science (519 papers), Community Health and Development (418 papers) and Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (291 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Health Promotion Practice are Sarah Lewis, Nina Wallerstein, Bonnie Duran, John P. Allegrante, Ray Marks, Janet Page‐Reeves, Holly Korda, Z Itani, Ruth P. Saunders and Rosemary Thackeray.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Health Promotion Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Health Promotion Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Health Promotion Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Health Promotion Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Health Promotion Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Health Promotion Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Health Promotion Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025