Nina Thomas
Impact in
- Family Practice top 5%
- Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Papers in
-
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies 8
- Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases 2
-
- Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies 3
- Co-authors
- Suellen M. Curkendall (2 shared papers)Paul Juneau (1 shared paper)Audrey J Weiss (1 shared paper)Kelly Bell (1 shared paper)Tuula Tyry (3 shared papers)Amber Salter (3 shared papers)Gary Cutter (2 shared papers)Ruth Ann Marrie (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Medical Economics (4 papers)International Journal of MS Care (2 papers)Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (1 paper)Clinical Therapeutics (1 paper)Current Medical Research and Opinion (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
Nina Thomas
11 papers receiving 295 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Family Practice 79
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 161
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 28
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 70
- Neurology 27
Countries citing papers authored by Nina Thomas
This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Thomas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Thomas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Thomas. The network helps show where Nina Thomas may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nina Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 113 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 55 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 27 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 1 |
About Nina Thomas
Nina Thomas is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Rheumatology, Health, Oncology and General Health Professions, having authored 11 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (8 papers), Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (3 papers), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (2 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (2 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (2 papers), Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (1 paper), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (1 paper) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (79 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (161 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (28 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (70 citations) and Neurology (27 citations). Nina Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Suellen M. Curkendall, Paul Juneau, Audrey J Weiss, Kelly Bell, Tuula Tyry, Amber Salter, Gary Cutter, Ruth Ann Marrie, Brett Hauber and Amanda M. Farr. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Economics, International Journal of MS Care, Expert Opinion on Drug Safety, Clinical Therapeutics and Current Medical Research and Opinion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.