Nina Gorlé

614 citations
8 papers · 466 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Neurology top 5%
    • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
    • Barrier Structure and Function Studies

Papers in

Nina Gorlé

8 papers receiving 461 citations

Peers

Nina Gorlé
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Biological Psychiatry 64
  • Neurology 154
  • Physiology 156
  • Aging 6
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 60
Replace Alborz Karimzadeh with:
Alborz Karimzadeh United States
Hugo Garneau Canada
Sandip Ashok Sonar India
Junping Pan China
Lúcia de Almeida United States
Yasmine Aguib Egypt
Nirmal K. Phulwani United States
Daryl S. Spinner United States
Manuel M. Gómez de las Heras Spain
Olivia Osborne United States
Nina Gorlé relative to Alborz Karimzadeh United States Alborz Karimzadeh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Alborz Karimzadeh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nina Gorlé

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Gorlé's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Gorlé with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Gorlé more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Gorlé

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Gorlé. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Gorlé. The network helps show where Nina Gorlé may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nina Gorlé, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nina Gorlé Line = papers co-authored together Nina Gorlé links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2015147
2 201892
3 201955
4 202147
5 201646
6 201736
7 202134
8 20199

About Nina Gorlé

Nina Gorlé is a scholar working on Physiology, Biological Psychiatry, Neurology, Surgery and Gastroenterology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 466 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (4 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (3 papers), Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (2 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (2 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers), Barrier Structure and Function Studies (1 paper), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (1 paper) and Virology and Viral Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (64 citations), Neurology (154 citations), Physiology (156 citations), Aging (6 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (60 citations). Nina Gorlé has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Serbia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Roosmarijn E. Vandenbroucke, Claude Libert, Elien Van Wonterghem, Caroline Van Cauwenberghe, Sriram Balusu, Marjana Brkić, Charysse Vandendriessche, Griet Van Imschoot, Lieve Moons and Bart De Strooper. Their work appears in journals such as Vaccines, Brain Behavior and Immunity, Mammalian Genome, Frontiers in Immunology and Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact