Mammalian Genome

3.8k papers and 87.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.8k papers published in Mammalian Genome in the last decades have received a total of 87.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Mammalian Genome usually cover Molecular Biology (2.5k papers), Genetics (1.7k papers) and Plant Science (472 papers) specifically the topics of Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (703 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (462 papers) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (375 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Mammalian Genome are Kenneth F. Manly, M Kozak, Robert H. Cudmore, Joseph H. Nadeau, Steve D. M. Brown, David W. Threadgill, Max F. Rothschild, Gary A. Churchill, James E. Womack and Fernando Pardo‐Manuel de Villena.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Mammalian Genome

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Mammalian Genome. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Mammalian Genome.

Countries where authors publish in Mammalian Genome

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Mammalian Genome. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Mammalian Genome with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mammalian Genome more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025