Nina Forestieri

1.0k citations
24 papers · 452 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Nina Forestieri

22 papers receiving 442 citations

Peers

Nina Forestieri
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Reproductive Medicine 36
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 76
  • Urology 20
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 78
  • Speech and Hearing 12
Replace Meredith Loveless with:
Meredith Loveless United States
Krzysztof Nowosielski Poland
Helen Paterson New Zealand
Henri Goldstein Denmark
Moy Fong Chen Canada
Janice Bacon United States
Susan Richman United States
Mondher Kassis Tunisia
L. B. McCullough United States
Knudsen Lb Denmark
Nina Forestieri relative to Meredith Loveless United States Meredith Loveless's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Meredith Loveless · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nina Forestieri

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Forestieri's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Forestieri with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Forestieri more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Forestieri

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Forestieri. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Forestieri. The network helps show where Nina Forestieri may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nina Forestieri, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nina Forestieri Line = papers co-authored together Nina Forestieri links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014105
2 202066
3 201957
4 201834
5 201733
6 201829
7 201721
8 202017
9 201614
10 202113
11 202312
12 20199
13 20218
14 20177
15 20206
16 20226
17 20215
18 20225
19 20232
20 20241

About Nina Forestieri

Nina Forestieri is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 24 papers that have together received 452 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Heart Disease Studies (5 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (3 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (2 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (2 papers) and Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (36 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (76 citations), Urology (20 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (78 citations) and Speech and Hearing (12 citations). Nina Forestieri has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Angela A. Crowley, Mark A. Canfield, Abbey Alkon, Sherika Hill, Sara E. Benjamin Neelon, Yi Pan, Jonathan B. Kotch, Robert E. Meyer, Jessica Knight and Sarah C. Fisher. Their work appears in journals such as Birth Defects Research, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, PLoS ONE and Frontiers in Pediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact