Nikolas Fechner

836 citations
21 papers · 414 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Nikolas Fechner

21 papers receiving 402 citations

Peers

Nikolas Fechner
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 292
  • Pharmacology 47
  • Molecular Biology 187
  • Spectroscopy 37
  • Materials Chemistry 101
Replace Nobuaki Yasuo with:
Nobuaki Yasuo Japan
Qurrat Ul Ain New Zealand
Tomoyuki Miyao Japan
Yuemin Bian United States
Simon Johansson Sweden
Thierry Hanser United Kingdom
Oliver Wieder Austria
Yankang Jing United States
Junnan Zhao China
Kathrin Heikamp Germany
Nikolas Fechner relative to Nobuaki Yasuo Japan Nobuaki Yasuo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Nobuaki Yasuo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nikolas Fechner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nikolas Fechner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nikolas Fechner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nikolas Fechner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nikolas Fechner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nikolas Fechner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nikolas Fechner. The network helps show where Nikolas Fechner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nikolas Fechner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nikolas Fechner Line = papers co-authored together Nikolas Fechner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201170
2 200969
3
Comparison of Different Approaches to Vibration-based Terrain Classification.
200740
4 201338
5 201037
6 201127
7 201823
8 202218
9 201716
10 200912
11 202312
12 202310
13 20129
14 20209
15 20107
16 20256
17 20106
18 20102
19 20111
20 20101

About Nikolas Fechner

Nikolas Fechner is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry, Spectroscopy and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 21 papers that have together received 414 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (19 papers), Machine Learning in Materials Science (9 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (4 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (3 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (3 papers), Machine Learning in Bioinformatics (2 papers) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (292 citations), Pharmacology (47 citations), Molecular Biology (187 citations), Spectroscopy (37 citations) and Materials Chemistry (101 citations). Nikolas Fechner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Zell, Andreas Jahn, Georg Hinselmann, Lars Rosenbaum, Gregory A. Landrum, Nikolaus Stiefl, Sereina Riniker, Nadine Schneider, Christian Weiß and Maximilian Beckers. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Journal of Cheminformatics, Molecular Informatics, Bioinformatics and Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact