Nick Kates

1.6k citations
78 papers · 1.1k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Nick Kates

74 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Nick Kates
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • General Health Professions 658
  • Social Psychology 428
  • Clinical Psychology 356
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 195
  • Health 88
Replace Barbara M. Rohland with:
Barbara M. Rohland United States
Emily Mumford United States
Jo‐Ann Giandinoto Australia
Graeme Browne Australia
Tanya Park Canada
Thomas R. Zastowny United States
Larry Wissow United States
Janine Archer United Kingdom
Emily M. Woltmann United States
Brigitta Spaeth‐Rublee United States
Nick Kates relative to Barbara M. Rohland United States Barbara M. Rohland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Barbara M. Rohland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nick Kates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Kates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Kates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Kates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Kates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Kates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Kates. The network helps show where Nick Kates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nick Kates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nick Kates Line = papers co-authored together Nick Kates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199766
2 200958
3 200756
4 199755
5 201150
6 199746
7 199741
8 201838
9
Integrated model for mental health care. Are health care providers satisfied with it?
200136
10 201936
11 201931
12 201929
13 200229
14 201727
15 201224
16 202123
17 199721
18 201721
19
The Psychosocial Impact of Job Loss
199021
20 200119

About Nick Kates

Nick Kates is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Philosophy, having authored 78 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (33 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (23 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (21 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (15 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (12 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (8 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (7 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (658 citations), Social Psychology (428 citations), Clinical Psychology (356 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (195 citations) and Health (88 citations). Nick Kates has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Marilyn Craven, Christopher Allen, Lindsey George, Raymond Tempier, Helen‐Maria Vasiliadis, Alain Lesage, Donald Campbell, Marc Cohen, Joan Bishop and Lynn Nash. Their work appears in journals such as The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, General Hospital Psychiatry, BMJ Open, Canadian Family Physician and Psychiatric Services.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact