Matthew Menear

3.3k citations
72 papers · 2.2k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Matthew Menear

65 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Matthew Menear
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • General Health Professions 672
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 206
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 244
  • Neurology 118
  • Applied Psychology 40
Replace Christopher L. Hunter with:
Christopher L. Hunter United States
Kristen Pickles Australia
Jiang Du China
Yan Cheng China
Winston Chiong United States
Barbara Berkman United States
Malachy Bishop United States
Amado Rivero‐Santana Spain
Alexander Grinshpoon Israel
Mary Jane England United States
Matthew Menear relative to Christopher L. Hunter United States Christopher L. Hunter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Christopher L. Hunter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Menear

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Menear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Menear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Menear more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Menear

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Menear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Menear. The network helps show where Matthew Menear may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Menear, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Menear Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Menear links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016223
2 2006216
3 2019193
4 2016140
5 2019105
6 201299
7 200679
8 201765
9 201961
10 200658
11 200955
12 201750
13 201650
14 201949
15 201747
16 201739
17 201737
18 201537
19 201635
20 201932

About Matthew Menear

Matthew Menear is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 72 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (9 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (6 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (6 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (5 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (5 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (5 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (672 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (206 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (244 citations), Neurology (118 citations) and Applied Psychology (40 citations). Matthew Menear has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include France Légaré, Martín Lepage, Alonso Montoya, Bruce H. Price, Arnaud Duhoux, Denis Roy, Marc‐André Blanchette, Olivier Demers‐Payette, Louise Fournier and Hubert Robitaille. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Health Expectations, The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Medical Decision Making and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact