Devon Indig

2.2k citations
64 papers · 1.7k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Devon Indig

64 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Devon Indig
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Clinical Psychology 468
  • General Health Professions 317
  • Health 85
  • Epidemiology 312
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 220
Replace Michael R. Pemberton with:
Michael R. Pemberton United States
Ricardo Orozco Mexico
Lynda A. R. Stein United States
David S. Fink United States
Jacek Moskalewicz Poland
Lilian A. Ghandour Lebanon
Cynthia A. Loveland Cook United States
Tyler N. A. Winkelman United States
Serge Brochu Canada
Pamela S. Hyde United States
Devon Indig relative to Michael R. Pemberton United States Michael R. Pemberton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Michael R. Pemberton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Devon Indig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Devon Indig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Devon Indig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Devon Indig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Devon Indig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Devon Indig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Devon Indig. The network helps show where Devon Indig may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Devon Indig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Devon Indig Line = papers co-authored together Devon Indig links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017126
2 2005122
3 201294
4 201093
5 201377
6 201366
7 200858
8 200548
9 201046
10 202046
11 201043
12 200840
13 201237
14 201735
15 201435
16 201533
17 201330
18 201230
19 201826
20 200525

About Devon Indig

Devon Indig is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (10 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (6 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (6 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (5 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (5 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (3 papers) and Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (468 citations), General Health Professions (317 citations), Health (85 citations), Epidemiology (312 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (220 citations). Devon Indig has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth A. Moore, Jan Copeland, Katherine M. Conigrave, Leigh Haysom, Tony Gerard Butler, A. Bauman, Anne Carolyn Grunseit, Stuart Gilmour, James R Bell and Stephen H. Allnutt. Their work appears in journals such as Drug and Alcohol Review, BMC Public Health, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Addiction and Health Promotion Journal of Australia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact