Nicholas Stoler
Impact in
- Clinical Biochemistry top 5%
- Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
Papers in
-
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 5
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 2
- Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications 2
- Mitochondrial Function and Pathology 2
- Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques 1
- Ecology 3
- Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Anton Nekrutenko (8 shared papers)Daniel Blankenberg (3 shared papers)Kateryna D. Makova (6 shared papers)Francesca Chiaromonte (3 shared papers)Gregory Von Kuster (1 shared paper)Dannon Baker (1 shared paper)James Taylor (1 shared paper)Dave Bouvier (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics (3 papers)Genome biology (2 papers)PLoS Biology (1 paper)BMC Bioinformatics (1 paper)Genome Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustriaItaly
In The Last Decade
Nicholas Stoler
11 papers receiving 690 citations
Nicholas Stoler's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Clinical Biochemistry 86
- Aging 16
- Molecular Biology 499
- Information Systems and Management 41
- Genetics 139
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Stoler
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Stoler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Stoler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Stoler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Stoler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Stoler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Stoler. The network helps show where Nicholas Stoler may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Stoler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sequencing error profiles of Illumina sequencing instruments Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 223 |
| 2 | 2014 | 176 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 156 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 62 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 2 |
About Nicholas Stoler
Nicholas Stoler is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology, Cancer Research, Computer Networks and Communications and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 11 papers that have together received 695 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (5 papers), Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (2 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (2 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (1 paper) and Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (86 citations), Aging (16 citations), Molecular Biology (499 citations), Information Systems and Management (41 citations) and Genetics (139 citations). Nicholas Stoler has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Anton Nekrutenko, Daniel Blankenberg, Kateryna D. Makova, Francesca Chiaromonte, Gregory Von Kuster, Dannon Baker, James Taylor, Dave Bouvier, Enis Afgan and Marcia Shu‐Wei Su. Their work appears in journals such as NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics, Genome biology, PLoS Biology, BMC Bioinformatics and Genome Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.