Dmitry Pushkarev
Impact in
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Genetics top 10%
- Genomics and Rare Diseases
Papers in
-
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 5
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 1
- Genetics 4
- Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities 2
- Forensic and Genetic Research 1
- Genetic Associations and Epidemiology 1
- Co-authors
- Stephen R. Quake (3 shared papers)Norma Neff (3 shared papers)Michael A. Kertesz (3 shared papers)Timothy A. Blauwkamp (2 shared papers)Dmitri A. Petrov (1 shared paper)Joanna L. Kelley (1 shared paper)Ryan W. Taylor (1 shared paper)Rajiv C. McCoy (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Genome Research (2 papers)Nature Biotechnology (2 papers)Nature Genetics (1 paper)eLife (1 paper)Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelItaly
In The Last Decade
Dmitry Pushkarev
8 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Molecular Biology 751
- Genetics 285
- Ecology 175
- Cancer Research 101
- Aging 9
Countries citing papers authored by Dmitry Pushkarev
This map shows the geographic impact of Dmitry Pushkarev's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dmitry Pushkarev with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dmitry Pushkarev more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dmitry Pushkarev
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dmitry Pushkarev. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dmitry Pushkarev. The network helps show where Dmitry Pushkarev may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dmitry Pushkarev, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 300 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 187 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 134 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 123 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 116 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 84 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 59 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 49 |
About Dmitry Pushkarev
Dmitry Pushkarev is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Ecology, Immunology and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 8 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (5 papers), Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (2 papers), Marine Ecology and Invasive Species (2 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (2 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (1 paper), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (1 paper), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (1 paper) and Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (751 citations), Genetics (285 citations), Ecology (175 citations), Cancer Research (101 citations) and Aging (9 citations). Dmitry Pushkarev has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Stephen R. Quake, Norma Neff, Michael A. Kertesz, Timothy A. Blauwkamp, Dmitri A. Petrov, Joanna L. Kelley, Ryan W. Taylor, Rajiv C. McCoy, Anna-Sophie Fiston-Lavier and Tim Blauwkamp. Their work appears in journals such as Genome Research, Nature Biotechnology, Nature Genetics, eLife and Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.