Nicholas Dames

859 citations
24 papers · 425 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 5
    • Contemporary Literature and Criticism 5
    • Modernist Literature and Criticism 4
    • Literature: history, themes, analysis 3
    • Short Stories in Global Literature 2
    • Joseph Conrad and Literature 2
    • Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior 3

Nicholas Dames

14 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers

Nicholas Dames
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Literature and Literary Theory 158
  • General Social Sciences 23
  • General Psychology 7
  • Artificial Intelligence 148
  • Music 13
Replace Joachim Scharloth with:
Joachim Scharloth Germany
Andrew Piper Canada
Ian Lancashire Canada
David L. Hoover United States
Jonathan Hope United Kingdom
Richard S. Robin
Adam Aitken United Kingdom
William A. Kretzschmar United States
Laura Otis Germany
James Sledd United States
Nicholas Dames relative to Joachim Scharloth Germany Joachim Scharloth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Joachim Scharloth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Dames

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Dames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Dames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Dames more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Dames

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Dames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Dames. The network helps show where Nicholas Dames may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Dames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Dames Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Dames links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010186
2
The physiology of the novel : reading, neural science, and the form of Victorian fiction
200788
3 200142
4 201024
5 199622
6 200415
7 200314
8 200110
9 20075
10 20014
11 20113
12 20092
13 20042
14 20032
15 20012
16 20022
17 20101
18 20041
19 20230
20 20010

About Nicholas Dames

Nicholas Dames is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Classics and Anthropology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 425 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (5 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (5 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (4 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers), Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior (3 papers), Short Stories in Global Literature (2 papers), Joseph Conrad and Literature (2 papers) and Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (158 citations), General Social Sciences (23 citations), General Psychology (7 citations), Artificial Intelligence (148 citations) and Music (13 citations). Nicholas Dames has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David K. Elson and Kathleen McKeown. Their work appears in journals such as Victorian Studies, NOVEL A Forum on Fiction, Representations, Memory Studies and Narrative.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact