˜The œHenry James review

679 papers and 1.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 679 papers published in ˜The œHenry James review in the last decades have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations. Papers published in ˜The œHenry James review usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (425 papers), Philosophy (124 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (115 papers) specifically the topics of Literature: history, themes, analysis (151 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (119 papers) and Short Stories in Global Literature (78 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ˜The œHenry James review are Éric Savoy, William Veeder, Leland S. Person, David Kurnick, John Carlos Rowe, Dorrit Cohn, bill brown, Jennifer Wicke, Cora Diamond and Martha Banta.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in ˜The œHenry James review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ˜The œHenry James review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ˜The œHenry James review.

Countries where authors publish in ˜The œHenry James review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ˜The œHenry James review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ˜The œHenry James review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ˜The œHenry James review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025