Countries where authors publish in Nineteenth-Century Literature
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nineteenth-Century Literature. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nineteenth-Century Literature with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nineteenth-Century Literature more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Nineteenth-Century Literature
This network shows the impact of papers published in Nineteenth-Century Literature. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nineteenth-Century Literature.
About Nineteenth-Century Literature
The 747 papers published in Nineteenth-Century Literature in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Nineteenth-Century Literature usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (362 papers), History (117 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (31 papers), Philosophy (73 papers) and Anthropology (43 papers) specifically the topics of Literature: history, themes, analysis (111 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (70 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (53 papers), American Literature and Humor Studies (39 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (30 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (30 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (29 papers) and Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (28 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nineteenth-Century Literature are David Perkins, Forrest G. Robinson, Ina Ferris, Karen R. Lawrence, Kate Flint, Lee Clark Mitchell, Joseph R. McElrath, Diego Saglia, Dianne F. Sadoff and Christopher Looby.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.