Population Health Management

1.0k papers and 11.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in Population Health Management in the last decades have received a total of 11.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Population Health Management usually cover General Health Professions (593 papers), Economics and Econometrics (329 papers) and Epidemiology (212 papers) specifically the topics of Primary Care and Health Outcomes (243 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (242 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (163 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Population Health Management are James E. Pope, W. R. C. Rowley, Clement Bezold, Carter Coberley, John La Puma, Erin Byrne, Yasemin Arikan, Elizabeth Y. Rula, Paul J. J. Bates and Rebecca Mitchell.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Population Health Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Population Health Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Population Health Management.

Countries where authors publish in Population Health Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Population Health Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Population Health Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Population Health Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025