Michael C. Leo

127 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Michael C. Leo
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • Orthodontics 108
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 346
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 149
  • Applied Psychology 96
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 157
Replace Henrietta L. Logan with:
Henrietta L. Logan United States
Christianne J. Lane United States
Heather Bush United States
Nerys Woolacott United Kingdom
Martha Adams United States
Connie Schardt United States
Jones United Kingdom
Thomas Owens United States
Matthew Stephenson Australia
César de Oliveira United Kingdom
Michael C. Leo relative to Henrietta L. Logan United States Henrietta L. Logan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Henrietta L. Logan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael C. Leo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael C. Leo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael C. Leo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael C. Leo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael C. Leo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael C. Leo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael C. Leo. The network helps show where Michael C. Leo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael C. Leo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael C. Leo Line = papers co-authored together Michael C. Leo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 138 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011209
2 2007181
3 2008175
4 2011162
5 2011154
6 2014148
7 2015127
8 2009112
9 2012108
10 201496
11 200689
12 200385
13 201185
14 201646
15 201344
16 201742
17 201341
18 200541
19 201740
20 201538

About Michael C. Leo

Michael C. Leo is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Oncology, Surgery, Genetics and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 138 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Rare Diseases (9 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (8 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (8 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (7 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (7 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (6 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthodontics (108 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (346 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (149 citations), Applied Psychology (96 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (157 citations). Michael C. Leo has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Nancy Perrin, Kerri M. Winters‐Stone, Lillian M. Nail, Anna L. Schwartz, Carla A. Green, Jill A. Bennett, J Dobek, Susan Butterworth, Judy Kendall and Victor J. Stevens. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Clinical Trials, Genetics in Medicine, Journal of Clinical Oncology, The Journal of Urology and Obesity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact