Jo-Anne Abbott

1.5k citations
41 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Jo-Anne Abbott

40 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Jo-Anne Abbott
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Applied Psychology 226
  • Clinical Psychology 219
  • Sensory Systems 39
  • Social Psychology 149
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 81
Replace Litza Kiropoulos with:
Litza Kiropoulos Australia
Raff Calitri United Kingdom
Hendrik Berth Germany
Erin Martz United States
Tom Van Daele Belgium
James W. Hannum United States
Adam Schweda Germany
Robin N. Kok Netherlands
Meghan McConnell Canada
Esben Strodl Australia
Jo-Anne Abbott relative to Litza Kiropoulos Australia Litza Kiropoulos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.8×
Litza Kiropoulos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jo-Anne Abbott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo-Anne Abbott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo-Anne Abbott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo-Anne Abbott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo-Anne Abbott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo-Anne Abbott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo-Anne Abbott. The network helps show where Jo-Anne Abbott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jo-Anne Abbott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jo-Anne Abbott Line = papers co-authored together Jo-Anne Abbott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008105
2 200999
3 201685
4 200171
5 201968
6 201464
7 200960
8 200856
9 201245
10 201242
11 201540
12 201639
13 201436
14 201834
15 201528
16 200722
17 201421
18 200819
19 200914
20 202014

About Jo-Anne Abbott

Jo-Anne Abbott is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Oncology, Social Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (9 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (9 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (2 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (226 citations), Clinical Psychology (219 citations), Sensory Systems (39 citations), Social Psychology (149 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (81 citations). Jo-Anne Abbott has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Britt Klein, David Austin, Lisa Ciechomski, Addie Wootten, Catherine Hamilton‐Giachritsis, Neil Thomas, Marita P. McCabe, Andrew J. Rosenthal, Angela Tod and Denny Meyer. Their work appears in journals such as Internet Interventions, Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Journal of Medical Internet Research and Telemedicine Journal and e-Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact