Jo-Anne Abbott

1.5k citations
41 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Jo-Anne Abbott

40 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Jo-Anne Abbott
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Applied Psychology 284
  • Clinical Psychology 303
  • Social Psychology 218
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 135
  • General Health Professions 224
Replace Sven Alfonsson with:
Sven Alfonsson Sweden
Raff Calitri United Kingdom
Ben Ainsworth United Kingdom
Hendrik Berth Germany
David V. Nelson United States
Yıldız Akvardar Türkiye
Al Herzog United States
Kenneth Fung Canada
Sheri L. Robb United States
Erin Martz United States
Jo-Anne Abbott relative to Sven Alfonsson Sweden Sven Alfonsson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Sven Alfonsson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jo-Anne Abbott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo-Anne Abbott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo-Anne Abbott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo-Anne Abbott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo-Anne Abbott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo-Anne Abbott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo-Anne Abbott. The network helps show where Jo-Anne Abbott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jo-Anne Abbott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jo-Anne Abbott Line = papers co-authored together Jo-Anne Abbott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008104
2 200997
3 201683
4 200171
5 201964
6 201463
7 200960
8 200856
9 201245
10 201241
11 201638
12 201537
13 201436
14 201832
15 201528
16 200722
17 201421
18 200819
19 200914
20 201514

About Jo-Anne Abbott

Jo-Anne Abbott is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions and Oncology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (9 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (8 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers) and LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (284 citations), Clinical Psychology (303 citations), Social Psychology (218 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (135 citations) and General Health Professions (224 citations). Jo-Anne Abbott has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Britt Klein, David Austin, Addie Wootten, Lisa Ciechomski, Catherine Hamilton‐Giachritsis, Neil Thomas, Marita P. McCabe, Andrew J. Rosenthal, Angela Tod and Michael Kyrios. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, Internet Interventions, Journal of Cancer Survivorship and Frontiers in Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact