Neil Sinclair
Impact in
- Philosophy top 1%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Free Will and Agency
Papers in
- Philosophy 24
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 19
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 12
-
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 10
- Free Will and Agency 10
- Co-authors
- Jon Robson (2 shared papers)Simon Blackburn (1 shared paper)Jeffrey O. Segrave (1 shared paper)David J. Vogel (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (3 papers)Analysis (3 papers)Philosophical Studies (2 papers)European Journal of Philosophy (1 paper)The Philosophical Quarterly (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Neil Sinclair
27 papers receiving 161 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
- Philosophy 192
- Cognitive Neuroscience 110
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 53
- History and Philosophy of Science 11
- General Health Professions 32
Countries citing papers authored by Neil Sinclair
This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Sinclair's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Sinclair with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Sinclair more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neil Sinclair
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Sinclair. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Sinclair. The network helps show where Neil Sinclair may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Neil Sinclair, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 23 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 20 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 4 |
About Neil Sinclair
Neil Sinclair is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Accounting, having authored 31 papers that have together received 217 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (19 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (12 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (10 papers), Free Will and Agency (10 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers) and Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (192 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (110 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (53 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (11 citations) and General Health Professions (32 citations). Neil Sinclair has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jon Robson, Simon Blackburn, Jeffrey O. Segrave and David J. Vogel. Their work appears in journals such as Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Analysis, Philosophical Studies, European Journal of Philosophy and The Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.