Neil Baum

2.1k citations
142 papers · 1.4k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Neil Baum

120 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Neil Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Urology 254
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 464
  • Rheumatology 204
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 176
  • Nephrology 44
Replace Hristina Vlajinac with:
Hristina Vlajinac Serbia
Juan Víctor Ariel Franco Argentina
Dean Elterman Canada
Sakineh Hajebrahimi Iran
Marietta Kaszkin-Bettag Germany
Murat Gül Türkiye
Lúcia Costa‐Paiva Brazil
Cynthia Davey United States
Giulia Villa Italy
Neri Alejandro Álvarez‐Villalobos Mexico
Neil Baum relative to Hristina Vlajinac Serbia Hristina Vlajinac's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Hristina Vlajinac · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Neil Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Baum. The network helps show where Neil Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Neil Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Neil Baum Line = papers co-authored together Neil Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 142 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997117
2 1975112
3 2017110
4 199368
5 201567
6 201365
7
Falls in the Elderly Secondary to Urinary Symptoms.
201644
8 201436
9 202035
10 200234
11 200931
12
3D Printing and Its Urologic Applications.
201528
13 201427
14 198725
15
[Suburethral sling for male urinary incontinence].
200223
16 199122
17 201022
18
Smoking: Its Impact on Urologic Health.
201520
19 199319
20 202019

About Neil Baum

Neil Baum is a scholar working on Urology, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions, Surgery and Rheumatology, having authored 142 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (18 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (18 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (17 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (13 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (12 papers), Social Media in Health Education (8 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers) and Genital Health and Disease (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (254 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (464 citations), Rheumatology (204 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (176 citations) and Nephrology (44 citations). Neil Baum has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include David F. Mobley, C. Eugene Carlton, Allison H. Feibus, Mohit Khera, Wayne J.G. Hellstrom, David L. Mobley, Landon Trost, Kenneth Goldberg, Laura Newman and Robert J. Krane. Their work appears in journals such as Urology, The Journal of Urology, Sexual Medicine Reviews, Urologic Clinics of North America and Postgraduate Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact