Urologic Clinics of North America

3.0k papers and 73.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.0k papers published in Urologic Clinics of North America in the last decades have received a total of 73.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Urologic Clinics of North America usually cover Surgery (1.2k papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.0k papers) and Urology (1.0k papers) specifically the topics of Urological Disorders and Treatments (648 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (456 papers) and Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (427 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Urologic Clinics of North America are Patrick C. Walsh, Jonathan I. Epstein, Andrew C. Novick, John W. Duckett, Alan W. Partin, Donald L. Lamm, Charles R. Pound, Tom F. Lue, Jack W. McAninch and Gary C. Curhan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Urologic Clinics of North America

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Urologic Clinics of North America. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Urologic Clinics of North America.

Countries where authors publish in Urologic Clinics of North America

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Urologic Clinics of North America. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Urologic Clinics of North America with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Urologic Clinics of North America more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025