Neil Angus

21 papers receiving 333 citations

Peers

Neil Angus
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Research and Theory 14
  • Family Practice 15
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 108
  • Rehabilitation 23
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 4
Replace Lorraine M. Thirsk with:
Lorraine M. Thirsk Canada
Mary D. Bondmass United States
Elliane Irani United States
Elizabeth Chin United States
Susan B. Bastable United States
Zyad T. Saleh Jordan
Margrét Hrönn Svavarsdóttir Iceland
Naif S. Alzahrani Saudi Arabia
Nick Bakalis Greece
Jayne Donaldson United Kingdom
Neil Angus relative to Lorraine M. Thirsk Canada Lorraine M. Thirsk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Lorraine M. Thirsk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Neil Angus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Angus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Angus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Angus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil Angus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Angus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Angus. The network helps show where Neil Angus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Neil Angus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Neil Angus Line = papers co-authored together Neil Angus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201169
2 201339
3 199938
4 200028
5 201321
6 200020
7 202020
8 202019
9 200118
10 202016
11 202014
12 201013
13 200110
14 20115
15 20215
16 20102
17 20202
18 20012
19 20191
20 20211

About Neil Angus

Neil Angus is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Social Psychology and Family Practice, having authored 21 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Health and Mental Health (5 papers), Disaster Response and Management (2 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (2 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (2 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (2 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (14 citations), Family Practice (15 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (108 citations), Rehabilitation (23 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (4 citations). Neil Angus has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Stephen J Leslie, William Lauder, William Reynolds, Julie Blair, David R. Thompson, Pat Thomson, J. Allen Scott, Patricia Thomson, W. Reynolds and Gordon F. Rushworth. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, Rural and Remote Health, BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact