N.E.C. Duke

856 citations
28 papers · 712 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

N.E.C. Duke

28 papers receiving 705 citations

Peers

N.E.C. Duke
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Environmental Engineering 288
  • Electrochemistry 99
  • Structural Biology 9
  • Molecular Biology 380
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 31
Replace Teresa Catarino with:
Teresa Catarino Portugal
Eric Merkley United States
Celia F. Goodhew United Kingdom
Euan Gordon Sweden
Lætitia Pieulle France
Jacob E. Shokes United States
Stefan Anemüller Germany
James W.A. Allen United Kingdom
C. Luna-Chavez United States
Krystle Reiss United States
N.E.C. Duke relative to Teresa Catarino Portugal Teresa Catarino's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Teresa Catarino · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N.E.C. Duke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N.E.C. Duke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N.E.C. Duke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N.E.C. Duke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N.E.C. Duke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N.E.C. Duke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N.E.C. Duke. The network helps show where N.E.C. Duke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N.E.C. Duke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N.E.C. Duke Line = papers co-authored together N.E.C. Duke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005138
2 200874
3 200468
4 200956
5 201152
6 200852
7 201049
8 200436
9 200827
10 201526
11 200816
12 201313
13 199212
14 200212
15 201310
16 20199
17 20208
18 19938
19 20138
20 20056

About N.E.C. Duke

N.E.C. Duke is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Environmental Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Spectroscopy and Ecology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 712 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation (9 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (9 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (6 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (5 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (3 papers), Porphyrin Metabolism and Disorders (2 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (2 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Engineering (288 citations), Electrochemistry (99 citations), Structural Biology (9 citations), Molecular Biology (380 citations) and Geochemistry and Petrology (31 citations). N.E.C. Duke has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Portugal and Canada. Frequent co-authors include P. Raj Pokkuluri, M. Schiffer, Yuri Y. Londer, Carlos A. Salgueiro, R. W. Alkire, Xiaojing Yang, Stephen Wood, F. J. Rotella, Miguel Pessanha and W. Christopher Long. Their work appears in journals such as Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics, Journal of Applied Crystallography, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation, Journal of Molecular Biology and Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact