Nava Blumen

819 citations
16 papers · 568 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Nava Blumen

16 papers receiving 551 citations

Peers

Nava Blumen
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Physiology 229
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 118
  • Pharmacology 107
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 31
  • Neurology 79
Replace Jan Rösner with:
Jan Rösner Switzerland
Rishi N. Sheth United States
Andrew Dilley United Kingdom
Caterina Leone Italy
Hans-Georg Schaible Germany
F.W. Bertelsmann Netherlands
Gudrun Goßrau Germany
Maciej Pawlak Poland
Elif Kocasoy Orhan Türkiye
Richard Kroening United States
Nava Blumen relative to Jan Rösner Switzerland Jan Rösner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Jan Rösner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nava Blumen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nava Blumen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nava Blumen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nava Blumen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nava Blumen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nava Blumen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nava Blumen. The network helps show where Nava Blumen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nava Blumen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nava Blumen Line = papers co-authored together Nava Blumen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2001139
2 2002103
3 201660
4 201155
5 199735
6 201931
7 200931
8 200028
9 199927
10 200622
11 201721
12 20216
13 19895
14
[Pressure sores: pathophysiology, prevention, treatment and rehabilitation].
19922
15
From the philosophy auditorium to the neurophysiology laboratory and back: from Bergson to Damasio.
20022
16 20001

About Nava Blumen

Nava Blumen is a scholar working on Physiology, Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 16 papers that have together received 568 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (4 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (3 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (1 paper), Vasculitis and related conditions (1 paper) and Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (229 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (118 citations), Pharmacology (107 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (31 citations) and Neurology (79 citations). Nava Blumen has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Ruth Defrin, A Ohry, Gideon Urca, Gabi Zeilig, Yocheved Laufer, Sergiu C. Blumen, Harold Weingarden, R Carasso, Itzhak Braverman and Mark Dolev. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Spinal Cord, Neuromuscular Disorders, Brain and Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact