Tim W. Ford

32 papers receiving 703 citations

Peers

Tim W. Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 240
  • Developmental Neuroscience 36
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 192
  • Neurology 71
  • Physiology 213
Replace Vitaliy A. Marchenko with:
Vitaliy A. Marchenko United States
Daniel Marlot France
Dorothy A. Herbert United States
Leonid G. Ermilov United States
R. Curtis Rogers United States
Estomih Phillip Mtui United States
Selden E. Spencer United States
Mary Rachael Lovett-Barr United States
Judith A. Neubauer United States
Ted D. Hoyda Canada
Tim W. Ford relative to Vitaliy A. Marchenko United States Vitaliy A. Marchenko's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Vitaliy A. Marchenko · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim W. Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim W. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim W. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim W. Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim W. Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim W. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim W. Ford. The network helps show where Tim W. Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tim W. Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim W. Ford Line = papers co-authored together Tim W. Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200085
2 199963
3 201053
4 201045
5 198837
6 198936
7 199033
8 198631
9 198731
10 197728
11 199022
12 199222
13 200722
14 198919
15 199119
16 199218
17 201317
18 200517
19 200216
20 201315

About Tim W. Ford

Tim W. Ford is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Physiology, Neurology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 33 papers that have together received 721 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (13 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (10 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (5 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (5 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (5 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (4 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (3 papers) and Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (240 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (36 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (192 citations), Neurology (71 citations) and Physiology (213 citations). Tim W. Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Rob W. Clarke, Peter Kirkwood, Julian Taylor, Peter N. McWilliam, Claire Francesca Meehan, John E. Harris, James F. Jones, Michael Fionn Carey, Andrew Todd and Charlotte Kidd. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, Journal of Neurophysiology, Pain, Brain Research and American Heart Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact