Gideon Urca

2.8k citations
61 papers · 2.5k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Gideon Urca

61 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Gideon Urca
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.4k
  • Physiology 1.3k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 111
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 97
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 260
Replace M.H.T. Roberts with:
M.H.T. Roberts United Kingdom
Bai‐Chuang Shyu Taiwan
Pamela E. Paulson United States
Mark J. Millan Germany
Wiel M.M. Honig Netherlands
Jean Marie Besson France
E. S. Vizi Hungary
Backil Sung United States
Jeong Seok Han United States
Jose Antonio Lopez-Garcia Spain
Gideon Urca relative to M.H.T. Roberts United Kingdom M.H.T. Roberts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
M.H.T. Roberts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gideon Urca

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gideon Urca's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gideon Urca with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gideon Urca more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gideon Urca

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gideon Urca. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gideon Urca. The network helps show where Gideon Urca may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gideon Urca, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gideon Urca Line = papers co-authored together Gideon Urca links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977336
2 1978201
3 2001151
4 1987121
5 1975116
6 2002115
7 198877
8 197971
9 198071
10 199668
11 197866
12 199064
13 198160
14
Analgesic and hyperalgesic effects of midazolam: dependence on route of administration.
198860
15 197657
16 199654
17 198047
18 198846
19 198544
20 198843

About Gideon Urca

Gideon Urca is a scholar working on Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (44 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (19 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (18 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (10 papers), Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (9 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (7 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (7 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.4k citations), Physiology (1.3k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (111 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (97 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (260 citations). Gideon Urca has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Hanan Frenk, John C. Liebeskind, Ruth Defrin, Anna N. Taylor, Nava Blumen, Avi Ohry, Glenn J. Giesler, Robert E. Lubow, Avital Ginton and David Niv. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Research, Pain, Anesthesia & Analgesia, European Journal of Pharmacology and Life Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact