Nathaniel C. Lim
Impact in
- Spectroscopy top 1%
- Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection
- Electrochemistry top 2%
- Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
Papers in
-
- Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection 7
-
- Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks 3
- Gene expression and cancer classification 2
- Co-authors
- Christian Brückner (6 shared papers)Hedley C. Freake (4 shared papers)Lili Yao (2 shared papers)Seok Choi (2 shared papers)Wei Zhang (2 shared papers)Daniel Skovronsky (2 shared papers)Franz Hefti (2 shared papers)Zhi‐Ping Zhuang (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Inorganic Chemistry (3 papers)Brain (2 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Database (1 paper)The Journal of Organic Chemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Nathaniel C. Lim
21 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Spectroscopy 686
- Electrochemistry 221
- Psychiatry and Mental health 351
- Bioengineering 147
- Physiology 541
Countries citing papers authored by Nathaniel C. Lim
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaniel C. Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaniel C. Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaniel C. Lim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaniel C. Lim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaniel C. Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaniel C. Lim. The network helps show where Nathaniel C. Lim may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathaniel C. Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 353 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 288 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 269 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 267 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 169 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 123 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 83 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 77 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 59 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 55 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 42 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 26 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 26 | |
| 14 | 2003 | 25 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 18 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 14 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 3 |
About Nathaniel C. Lim
Nathaniel C. Lim is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Electrochemistry and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (7 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (5 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (5 papers), Trace Elements in Health (4 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (3 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (3 papers) and Gene expression and cancer classification (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (686 citations), Electrochemistry (221 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (351 citations), Bioengineering (147 citations) and Physiology (541 citations). Nathaniel C. Lim has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Christian Brückner, Hedley C. Freake, Lili Yao, Seok Choi, Wei Zhang, Daniel Skovronsky, Franz Hefti, Zhi‐Ping Zhuang, Tyler E. Benedum and Michael R. Kilbourn. Their work appears in journals such as Inorganic Chemistry, Brain, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Database and The Journal of Organic Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.