Nathaniel C. Lim

2.5k citations
21 papers · 2.0k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Nathaniel C. Lim

21 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Nathaniel C. Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Spectroscopy 692
  • Electrochemistry 221
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 372
  • Bioengineering 151
  • Physiology 567
Replace Marc d. Paradis with:
Marc d. Paradis United States
Jung Hwa Lee South Korea
Hirotada G. Fujii Japan
Chongzhao Ran United States
Genevieve C. Van de Bittner United States
Chiara Frassineti Italy
Juhye Kang South Korea
Linda J. Roman United States
Michael Almy Channing United States
Sergey A. Kozin Russia
Nathaniel C. Lim relative to Marc d. Paradis United States Marc d. Paradis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.3×
Marc d. Paradis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathaniel C. Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaniel C. Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaniel C. Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaniel C. Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaniel C. Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaniel C. Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaniel C. Lim. The network helps show where Nathaniel C. Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathaniel C. Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathaniel C. Lim Line = papers co-authored together Nathaniel C. Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009377
2 2004291
3 2017284
4 2005273
5 2019174
6 2004124
7 200885
8 201978
9 201161
10 201557
11 200342
12 202131
13 200326
14 202125
15 200919
16 200817
17 200614
18 202310
19 20106
20 20173

About Nathaniel C. Lim

Nathaniel C. Lim is a scholar working on Electrochemistry, Spectroscopy, Nutrition and Dietetics, Physiology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 21 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (7 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (5 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (5 papers), Trace Elements in Health (4 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (3 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (3 papers) and Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (692 citations), Electrochemistry (221 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (372 citations), Bioengineering (151 citations) and Physiology (567 citations). Nathaniel C. Lim has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Christian Brückner, Hedley C. Freake, Lili Yao, Zhi‐Ping Zhuang, Wei Zhang, Daniel Skovronsky, Tyler E. Benedum, Seok Choi, Franz F. Hefti and Hank F. Kung. Their work appears in journals such as Inorganic Chemistry, Brain, Scientific Reports, Organic Letters and Chemical Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact